SlickEdit Product Discussion > SlickEdit®

Beware ":b" in regular expressions - There be dragons...

<< < (2/2)

Besides the impact to the Slick-codebase it's difficult to decide which else reg-exp 'standards' to support.
E.g. POSIX is a real standard and widely accepted too.
Since a while I moved to Slick's reg-exp.s b/c it's unmatched powerful (when using Slick of course).

But I agree - would be nice if the major (mostly used) reg-exp.s are supported.


Well, I've never seen the Slick codebase, but you'd think adding a new reg-exp would be pretty localised. 

Then again, as with a lot of code that has some history attached to it, the code may be organically growing in strange, and bold, directions making such an addition difficult and unlikely.



[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version