Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last letter in the word "SlickEdit":
How many LETTERS are in the following? "a1b2c3":
Which number is missing?  "12345689":

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: RaffoPazzo
« on: September 11, 2012, 02:05:11 PM »

Thanks for your reply.
I really hope SE's java support will soon be as full as the C/C++ is and that it will finally far ahead than the Eclipse/NetBeans counterparts...
Posted by: patrick
« on: September 11, 2012, 01:38:43 PM »

It's not due as much to deep differences in syntax, as to the available time.  SE2012 was heavily front-loaded with a lot of work for the generic pieces of the beautifier engine and related boilerplate, so C++ and Obj-C was all we could fit into the schedule. 

Now that the basics are already in, adding Java into SE2013 has been mostly a matter of just addressing the differences between our "common to most brace languages" module, and additional syntax in Java.  So it's going pretty quickly.

Posted by: RaffoPazzo
« on: September 11, 2012, 09:26:37 AM »

That's the question...What's that deep difference with C/C++/ObjectiveC and Java such that this features isn't available for Java too?