Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last letter in the word "SlickEdit":
How many LETTERS are in the following? "a1b2c3":
Which number is missing?  "12345689":

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: hs2
« on: October 20, 2007, 12:29:06 AM »

Thanks Scott, it's ok to know that it will be fixed sooner or later.
Although unsurround is very cool I'm not using it every day (in contrast to surround-with).
HS2
Posted by: ScottW, VP of Dev
« on: October 19, 2007, 06:26:29 PM »

I have filed a change request for this and assigned it to our next release. I can't say when this will be fixed or whether a hot fix is possible.
Posted by: hs2
« on: October 19, 2007, 02:30:52 PM »

Seems that this still applies to v12.0.3 :(
@SlickTeam: Any chance to get a hotfix for that ?
HS2
Posted by: lambertia
« on: June 08, 2007, 02:26:00 AM »

Hi.

"Unsurround the block" does not move the ident level of the comments (at least for me). This ocurrs with comment wrapping on or off. For example, starting with:

Code: [Select]
    {
        //
        //  Single values take precedence.
        //
   
        resultp = SingleSearch(value);
        if (!resultp)
        {
            //
            //  Next try a range search.
            //
   
            resultp = RangeSearch(value);
            if (!resultp)
            {
                //
                //  Use the default contents.
                //
   
                resultp = &vDefaultContents;
            }
        }
   
        return (*resultp);
    }

If I unsurround this I end up with:

Code: [Select]
        //
        //  Single values take precedence.
        //

    resultp = SingleSearch(value);
    if (!resultp)
    {
            //
            //  Next try a range search.
            //

        resultp = RangeSearch(value);
        if (!resultp)
        {
                //
                //  Use the default contents.
                //

            resultp = &vDefaultContents;
        }
    }

Cheers,
--
Greg.